Calories Burned Weight Lifting Calculator

Estimate the calories you burn lifting weights from your body weight, session length, and effort level using the standard MET (metabolic equivalent) method.

Quick Facts

Method
MET formula: calories = METs × 3.5 × kg ÷ 200 × minutes
1 MET = 3.5 ml O₂/kg/min at rest; ~5 kcal per liter of oxygen burned.

Your Results

Calculated
Calories burned
-
Total for this session
Calories per minute
-
Burn rate at this effort
Per hour
-
If sustained for 60 min

Ready

Enter your body weight, session length, and effort level, then calculate.

How the calories-burned-lifting calculation works

Weight lifting burns calories in proportion to how hard your body works and how long you work. This calculator uses the MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) method, the same approach used by the Compendium of Physical Activities and most fitness trackers. One MET is your resting metabolic rate, defined as an oxygen uptake of 3.5 milliliters per kilogram of body weight per minute. An activity rated at 5 METs makes you burn energy five times faster than sitting still.

The formula

The core equation is:

Calories = METs × 3.5 × body weight (kg) ÷ 200 × duration (minutes)

The constants come from exercise physiology. Oxygen consumption in ml/min equals METs × 3.5 × weight in kg. Burning one liter (1,000 ml) of oxygen releases roughly 5 kcal, so dividing ml/min by 1,000 and multiplying by 5 is the same as dividing by 200. Multiply the resulting kcal/min by your session length to get total calories. If you enter your weight in pounds, the calculator first converts it to kilograms by dividing by 2.20462.

How many METs is weight lifting?

The 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities lists resistance training at several intensities. Light-to-moderate effort (machine circuits, lighter free weights, general toning) is about 3.5 METs. A typical mixed strength session lands near 5.0 METs. Vigorous effort — heavy powerlifting or bodybuilding with challenging loads and short rest — is about 6.0 METs. The longer your rest periods between sets, the lower your effective MET value, because your heart rate falls while you recover.

Worked example

A 170 lb lifter (77.1 kg) doing a general 45-minute session at 5.0 METs burns 5.0 × 3.5 × 77.1 ÷ 200 × 45 ≈ 304 calories, or about 6.7 calories per minute. Bump the effort to 6.0 METs and the same session burns roughly 364 calories. Because the result scales directly with body weight, a 220 lb (99.8 kg) lifter doing the identical 5.0-MET session burns about 393 calories.

Why estimate calories from lifting?

Strength training raises your daily energy expenditure both during the workout and, to a smaller degree, afterward through excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). Knowing the per-session figure helps you plan a calorie deficit for fat loss, a surplus for muscle gain, or simply reconcile your training against a daily target. Unlike steady-state cardio, lifting is intermittent, so treat the number as a session average rather than a moment-by-moment reading.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate is the MET estimate for lifting?
The MET method is a population-average model. It captures body weight, duration, and effort well, but it does not account for your individual muscle mass, training economy, or exact rest intervals. For most people the estimate is within about 10–15% of measured energy expenditure. It tends to slightly overestimate for people who take long rests between sets and underestimate for high-density circuits.
Does the calculator include the afterburn (EPOC)?
No. The formula estimates only the calories burned during the session itself. Resistance training does raise metabolism for hours afterward through EPOC, but that effect is typically small — on the order of 5–7% of the workout's calories for a hard session — and too variable to model reliably here.
Why does the result depend so heavily on body weight?
Energy cost scales with the mass you move, and MET values are defined per kilogram of body weight. A heavier person doing the same exercise for the same time burns proportionally more. That is why the formula multiplies directly by your weight in kilograms rather than treating everyone the same.