Bug-Rivet Paradox

Apply Peterson's notch-sensitivity formula to a hole of any size: get notch sensitivity q and fatigue stress-concentration factor Kf, and see why a bug-sized pit and a rivet hole with the same theoretical Kt affect fatigue strength so differently.

Quick Facts

Formula
q = 1 / (1 + a/r), then Kf = 1 + q(Kt − 1)
Peterson's notch-sensitivity equation links the size-independent Kt to the size-dependent fatigue factor Kf.
The paradox
Kt = 3 for any circular hole in uniaxial tension, regardless of size
Kirsch's elastic solution gives the same stress concentration for a bug-sized pit and a large rivet hole.

Your Results

Calculated
Notch sensitivity, q
-
0 = insensitive, 1 = fully sensitive
Fatigue factor, Kf
-
Actual fatigue effect of the notch
Theoretical peak stress
-
Kt × σ — size-independent (the paradox)
Fatigue-effective peak stress
-
Kf × σ — accounts for notch size

Ready

Enter the hole radius, material constant, Kt, and nominal stress, then press Calculate.

About the Bug-Rivet Paradox

The bug-rivet paradox is a classic illustration from fatigue and fracture mechanics: a small circular hole in a stressed plate concentrates stress by the same theoretical factor, Kt = 3, whether that hole is the size of a rivet or the size of a pit left by a bug in wet paint. Classical elasticity theory (Kirsch's solution for a hole in an infinite plate under uniaxial tension) says the peak stress is always three times the nominal stress, regardless of the hole's absolute size. Yet engineers know from experience that a tiny flaw is far less damaging to fatigue life than a large one — the paradox is resolved by notch sensitivity, a separate, size-dependent correction.

Understanding the formula

Peterson's empirical notch-sensitivity equation bridges the gap: q = 1 / (1 + a/r), where r is the notch (hole) radius and a is a material-dependent characteristic length (Peterson's constant, larger for tougher, lower-strength materials and smaller for harder, higher-strength ones). The notch sensitivity q then converts the size-independent Kt into the size-dependent fatigue stress-concentration factor: Kf = 1 + q(Kt − 1). As r shrinks toward or below a, q falls toward 0 and Kf approaches 1 — the notch stops mattering for fatigue even though Kt never changes. As r grows much larger than a, q approaches 1 and Kf approaches the full Kt.

Working with units

  • Enter the hole radius r and the material constant a in the same length unit (this calculator uses millimeters); mixing units silently breaks the a/r ratio.
  • Kt = 3 is the standard value for a small circular hole in an infinite plate under uniaxial tension; adjust it if you are modeling a different notch geometry (an elliptical hole or a fillet, for example).
  • Peterson's constant a is empirical and material-specific — typical published values for steels range from roughly 0.01 mm (very high strength) to over 0.2 mm (mild, ductile steel), decreasing as ultimate tensile strength increases.

Knowing the limits

This formula assumes a single circular through-hole in a wide, thin plate under uniform far-field tension, with Kt taken from Kirsch's solution. It does not model multiple interacting holes, sharp cracks (which use fracture-mechanics stress-intensity factors instead), or fully three-dimensional stress states. Peterson's a is a curve-fit to test data for a given material and should be sourced from a reference table for that specific alloy and strength level, not assumed universal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the bug-rivet paradox?
Classical elasticity theory gives the same theoretical stress concentration factor, Kt = 3, for a small circular hole under uniaxial tension no matter how large or small that hole is - whether it was drilled for a rivet or left by a bug landing in wet paint. Experience shows small holes are far less damaging to fatigue strength than large ones, and the paradox is resolved by notch sensitivity, not by Kt itself changing with size.
What is notch sensitivity, q?
Notch sensitivity q measures how much of the theoretical stress concentration Kt actually reduces a part's fatigue strength. Peterson's formula gives q = 1 / (1 + a/r), where r is the notch radius and a is an empirical material constant. q ranges from 0 (the notch has almost no effect on fatigue strength) to 1 (the full Kt applies).
How is the fatigue stress-concentration factor Kf calculated?
Once q is known, the fatigue stress-concentration factor is Kf = 1 + q(Kt - 1). Kf always falls between 1 and Kt, and it is Kf, not Kt, that should be used to estimate fatigue strength reduction for a real notched part.
Why does hole size matter if Kt stays the same?
Kt comes from elasticity theory and ignores the material's microstructure. Peterson's constant a represents a material-dependent length scale tied to grain size and crack-initiation behavior. As the notch radius r shrinks toward or below a, q falls toward zero, so Kf approaches 1 even though Kt is unchanged - a tiny hole has almost no fatigue effect while a large one nearly reaches the full theoretical Kt.