The Central Limit Theorem in plain terms
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) says that if you take many random samples of size n from any population with mean μ and finite standard deviation σ, the distribution of the sample means becomes approximately normal as n grows — even when the original population is skewed, bimodal, or otherwise non-normal. This is the reason the normal distribution shows up almost everywhere in applied statistics and why so much of inference (confidence intervals, z-tests, t-tests) rests on it.
Two facts describe that sampling distribution exactly. First, its mean equals the population mean: the average of all possible sample means is μ itself (the sample mean is an unbiased estimator). Second, its spread is smaller than the population's by a factor of √n.
The formulas this calculator uses
The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean is called the standard error of the mean (SE):
SE = σ / √n
So the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately:
X̄ ≈ Normal( μ , σ²/n )
To find the probability that a sample mean lands above, below, or between chosen values, convert each value to a z-score and read the standard normal distribution:
z = ( x − μ ) / SE = ( x − μ ) / (σ/√n)
Note the difference from an individual observation: a single data point uses z = (x − μ)/σ, but a sample mean uses the standard error σ/√n in the denominator, which makes sample means cluster far more tightly than individual values.
A worked example
Suppose IQ-style scores have μ = 100 and σ = 15. For a sample of n = 25 people, the standard error is SE = 15/√25 = 15/5 = 3. What is the chance the sample's average score is 103 or less? The z-score is (103 − 100)/3 = 1.00, and the standard normal CDF at z = 1 is about 0.8413, so P(X̄ ≤ 103) ≈ 84.1%. By contrast, a single person scoring 103 or less has z = (103 − 100)/15 = 0.20, giving only about 57.9% — a smaller probability because individual scores vary more than averages of 25 scores.
Why √n and not n
Because variances of independent variables add, the variance of the sample mean is σ²/n. Taking the square root to get a standard deviation leaves σ/√n. The practical consequence is diminishing returns: cutting the standard error in half requires quadrupling the sample size, not doubling it. Going from n = 100 to n = 400 halves SE; going from 400 to 800 only reduces it by about 29%.