How to use this calculator
Enter the expected annual return (μ), the annual volatility (σ), a time horizon in years, and a starting value, then click Calculate. The calculator returns the geometric drift index — the compounded growth rate after adjusting for volatility — plus the volatility drag and two projected values. Click Clear to reset all fields and start a new calculation.
The formula
For a process that follows geometric Brownian motion (the standard model behind log-normal growth, used for things like stock-price and portfolio-value modeling), the arithmetic mean return μ and the compounded, or geometric, growth rate are not the same number. The geometric drift index is:
Geometric drift = μ − σ²/2
where μ is the expected annual return (as a decimal) and σ is the annual volatility, or standard deviation of returns (as a decimal). The term σ²/2 is called volatility drag: it is the amount by which compounding pulls the typical, or median, growth path below the simple average return. Projected values follow from continuous compounding: the typical path after t years is Starting Value × e^((μ − σ²/2) × t), while the expected (mean) path is Starting Value × e^(μ × t).
Understanding the inputs
Expected Annual Return (μ) is the arithmetic average return you expect per year, entered as a percentage. Annual Volatility (σ) is the standard deviation of those annual returns — a measure of how much they swing around the average — also entered as a percentage. Time Horizon is how many years to project forward, and Starting Value is the dollar amount at time zero.
Interpreting the results
The Geometric Drift Index is the headline number: it is the rate at which a typical (median) outcome actually compounds once volatility is taken into account, and it is always less than or equal to μ. Volatility Drag shows exactly how much return volatility costs you — the higher the volatility, the bigger the gap. The two projected values let you compare the typical outcome against the average outcome: the expected (mean) path is pulled up by rare large gains, while the typical (median) path better reflects what most single outcomes actually look like.