About the Glasgow Coma Scale
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was introduced by Teasdale and Jennett in 1974 as a simple, reproducible way to describe a person's level of consciousness after a head injury. It remains the most widely used consciousness scale in emergency medicine, trauma care, and neurology. The scale scores three separate behaviors - eye opening, verbal response, and motor response - and sums them into a single total from 3 to 15.
How the score is built
Each component is scored on the best response observed, using an appropriate stimulus:
- Eye opening (E, 1-4): 4 for spontaneous opening, 3 for opening to speech, 2 for opening to pain, 1 for no opening.
- Verbal response (V, 1-5): 5 for oriented speech, 4 for confused conversation, 3 for inappropriate words, 2 for incomprehensible sounds, 1 for no sound. When a patient is intubated or has a tracheostomy, verbal cannot be tested directly; convention scores it as 1 and flags the total with a "T" (for example, 9T).
- Motor response (M, 1-6): 6 for obeying commands, 5 for localizing pain, 4 for normal withdrawal from pain, 3 for abnormal (decorticate) flexion, 2 for extension (decerebrate) posturing, 1 for no movement.
Adding the three components (E + V + M) gives the total GCS, ranging from 3 (deep coma) to 15 (fully alert and oriented).
Interpreting the result
Under the classification originally proposed by Teasdale and Jennett, a total of 13-15 is generally described as mild impairment, 9-12 as moderate, and 3-8 as severe. A GCS of 8 or below is commonly used in clinical teaching as a threshold associated with loss of protective airway reflexes. These bands are a widely used shorthand, not a diagnosis - the individual E, V, and M components matter as much as the total, since the same total can be reached by different combinations.
When to consult a professional
This tool performs the standard GCS arithmetic for education and documentation. It does not replace a hands-on neurological assessment, does not account for sedation, intoxication, or paralysis, and is not a substitute for evaluation by a qualified healthcare provider. Any change in a person's level of consciousness should be assessed by trained medical personnel.