EORTC Bladder Cancer Recurrence and Progression Calculator

Calculate your eortc bladder cancer recurrence and progression using evidence-based formulas with clear interpretation guidance.

Quick Facts

What it is
EORTC NMIBC risk tables
Predicts recurrence and progression after TURBT for Ta/T1 bladder tumors, from a pooled analysis of 2,596 patients in 7 EORTC trials (Sylvester et al., 2006).
Recurrence score range
0-17 points
Weighted mainly by number of tumors and prior recurrence rate.
Progression score range
0-23 points
Weighted mainly by T category, concurrent CIS, and tumor grade.
Scope
Original 2006 tables
Predates routine repeat TURBT and maintenance BCG; newer EAU/CUETO tables refine risk for BCG-treated patients.

Your Results

Calculated
Recurrence score
-
Sum of weighted points, 0-17
Recurrence probability
-
1-year and 5-year estimates
Progression score
-
Sum of weighted points, 0-23
Progression probability
-
1-year and 5-year estimates

Ready

Select the six TURBT pathology factors, then press Calculate.

How the EORTC Recurrence and Progression Risk Tables Work

The EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) risk tables estimate how likely a non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor (stage Ta or T1) is to come back or advance to muscle-invasive disease after it has been removed by transurethral resection (TURBT). Sylvester and colleagues built the tables from a pooled analysis of 2,596 patients enrolled in 7 EORTC trials, scoring six routinely available pathology and history factors and matching the resulting score to an observed probability of recurrence and progression at 1 and 5 years. This calculator reproduces those two 2006 EORTC scoring tables and their published probability bands. It is an educational estimate, not a diagnosis or a treatment order — discuss your specific pathology report and surveillance plan with a urologist.

The six risk factors and their point values

Each factor contributes a different number of points to the recurrence score and to the progression score, because the two outcomes are driven by different biology:

  • Number of tumors: single = 0 recurrence / 0 progression points; 2-7 tumors = 3 / 3; 8 or more = 6 / 3.
  • Tumor diameter: under 3 cm = 0 / 0 points; 3 cm or larger = 3 / 3 points.
  • Prior recurrence rate: primary tumor (no prior recurrence) = 0 / 0; 1 or fewer recurrences per year = 2 / 2; more than 1 per year = 4 / 2.
  • T category: Ta = 0 / 0 points; T1 = 1 / 4 points.
  • Concurrent carcinoma in situ (CIS): absent = 0 / 0; present = 1 / 6 points.
  • Grade (WHO 1973): G1 = 0 / 0; G2 = 1 / 0; G3 = 2 / 5 points.

Adding the first number in each pair gives the total recurrence score (0-17); adding the second number gives the total progression score (0-23). Notice how T category, CIS, and grade barely move the recurrence score but dominate the progression score — that reflects the trial data showing those features are stronger predictors of invasive progression than of simple recurrence.

From score to risk: the probability tables

Each total score falls into one of four published bands. For recurrence: a score of 0 corresponds to a 15% chance of recurrence at 1 year and 31% at 5 years; 1-4 points to 24%/46%; 5-9 points to 38%/62%; and 10-17 points to 61%/78%. For progression: a score of 0 corresponds to 0.2% at 1 year and 0.8% at 5 years; 2-6 points to 1%/6%; 7-13 points to 5%/17%; and 14-23 points to 17%/45%. These are population-level probabilities from the original trial cohort, not a certainty for any one patient — they are most useful for comparing the relative risk of different tumor profiles and for planning how intensive follow-up cystoscopy or adjuvant intravesical therapy should be.

Limitations and when to seek specialist input

The 2006 EORTC tables were built largely from patients who did not routinely receive a second ("re-resection") TURBT or maintenance BCG therapy, both of which are now standard for higher-risk tumors — as a result, the tables tend to overestimate risk for patients treated with modern protocols, particularly for progression. Newer tools (the EORTC tables for BCG-treated patients and the Spanish CUETO model) refine these estimates for that population. This calculator is for education and discussion, not for staging, prescribing, or replacing a urologist's individualized surveillance and treatment plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the EORTC recurrence and progression scores measure?
The EORTC risk tables use six pathology and history factors from a TURBT — number of tumors, tumor size, prior recurrence rate, T category (Ta vs T1), concurrent carcinoma in situ, and tumor grade — to calculate two separate weighted scores: a recurrence score (0-17) and a progression score (0-23). Each score maps to a published 1-year and 5-year probability band from Sylvester et al.'s 2006 pooled analysis of 2,596 EORTC trial patients.
Why do recurrence and progression use different point weights for the same factors?
The two outcomes are driven by different biology. Recurrence is most influenced by how many tumors are present and how often the disease has recurred before, so those factors carry the most points in the recurrence score. Progression to muscle-invasive disease is driven more by T category, concurrent CIS, and grade, so those factors are weighted much more heavily in the progression score.
Is a low EORTC score a reason to skip follow-up cystoscopy?
No. Even the lowest-risk band still carries a measurable chance of recurrence, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer requires surveillance cystoscopy on a schedule set by your urologist regardless of score. The EORTC tables estimate population-level probabilities to help plan follow-up intensity and treatment such as intravesical therapy — they do not replace a urologist's individualized surveillance plan.
Does this calculator apply to patients who received BCG or repeat TURBT?
Not precisely. The original 2006 EORTC tables were built from patients treated before repeat TURBT and maintenance BCG were routine, so they tend to overestimate risk for patients managed with modern protocols. Updated tools, such as the EORTC tables for BCG-treated patients or the CUETO scoring model, are better suited to that group — ask your urologist which risk model applies to your treatment history.