Moment of inertia quantifies an object's resistance to changes in its rotational motion, serving as the rotational equivalent of mass in linear dynamics. While mass determines how much force is needed to accelerate an object in a straight line, moment of inertia determines how much torque is required to achieve a given angular acceleration. This property depends not only on the total mass but crucially on how that mass distributes relative to the axis of rotation.
The concept emerged from Newton's laws applied to rotating systems. Just as F = ma governs linear motion, τ = Iα governs rotational motion, where τ is torque, I is moment of inertia, and α is angular acceleration. This parallel structure allows engineers and physicists to analyze rotating systems using familiar mathematical frameworks.
I = Σ mᵢrᵢ²
For continuous bodies:
I = ∫ r² dm
Variables defined:
The r² dependence means that mass far from the rotation axis contributes dramatically more to the moment of inertia than mass close to the axis. Doubling the distance quadruples the contribution. This explains why figure skaters spin faster when pulling their arms in, and why flywheels store more energy when mass concentrates at the rim.
| Shape | Axis Location | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Point mass | Distance r away | I = mr² |
| Solid sphere | Through center | I = (2/5)mr² |
| Hollow sphere | Through center | I = (2/3)mr² |
| Solid cylinder/disk | Central axis | I = (1/2)mr² |
| Hollow cylinder | Central axis | I = (1/2)m(r₁² + r₂²) |
| Thin hoop/ring | Central axis | I = mr² |
| Thin rod | Through center | I = (1/12)mL² |
| Thin rod | Through end | I = (1/3)mL² |
| Rectangular plate | Through center | I = (1/12)m(w² + h²) |
| Solid cone | Central axis | I = (3/10)mr² |
When the rotation axis doesn't pass through the center of mass, the parallel axis theorem provides a powerful shortcut. If you know the moment of inertia about an axis through the center of mass, you can find it about any parallel axis:
I = I_cm + md²
Where d is the distance between the parallel axes
This theorem explains why a rod rotating about its end has greater moment of inertia than when rotating about its center. The (1/3)mL² for end rotation equals (1/12)mL² (center) plus m(L/2)² (the parallel axis contribution).
Problem: Design a steel flywheel to store 10 MJ of rotational kinetic energy at 3000 RPM.
Given:
Solution:
Rotational KE = (1/2)Iω²
I = 2 × KE / ω² = 2 × 10,000,000 / 314.16²
I = 20,000,000 / 98,696 = 202.6 kg·m²
For a solid disk: I = (1/2)mr²
If r = 0.5 m: m = 2I/r² = 2 × 202.6 / 0.25 = 1620.8 kg
Result: A solid steel disk 0.5 m radius, 1621 kg mass stores 10 MJ at 3000 RPM.
Rotational Dynamics: Understanding moment of inertia is essential for predicting how objects respond to applied torques. Engineers use these calculations for everything from designing vehicle wheels to analyzing satellite attitude control systems.
Energy Storage: The rotational kinetic energy KE = (1/2)Iω² depends directly on moment of inertia. Flywheels designed for energy storage maximize moment of inertia while staying within material strength limits.
Stability: Objects with larger moments of inertia resist changes to their rotation more strongly. This principle underlies gyroscopic stabilization used in ships, aircraft, and spacecraft.
For flat (planar) objects, the perpendicular axis theorem relates moments of inertia about three mutually perpendicular axes:
I_z = I_x + I_y
Where z is perpendicular to the plane containing x and y
This theorem applies only to planar objects (thin plates, disks, etc.). It simplifies calculations when you know moments of inertia about two in-plane axes and need the third perpendicular axis.
The radius of gyration (k) represents the distance from the rotation axis at which all the object's mass could be concentrated to give the same moment of inertia:
I = mk² or k = √(I/m)
This concept simplifies comparisons between objects of different shapes and sizes. A solid sphere has k² = (2/5)r², while a thin hoop has k² = r², showing that the hoop's mass is effectively further from the axis.
For three-dimensional analysis, moment of inertia becomes a tensor (3×3 matrix) rather than a single scalar. The tensor captures how the object responds to rotation about any arbitrary axis, not just principal axes. Off-diagonal elements (products of inertia) cause objects to wobble unless they rotate about a principal axis.
Principal axes are directions for which the moment of inertia tensor becomes diagonal. For symmetric objects, these principal axes align with geometric symmetry axes. Finding principal moments of inertia involves eigenvalue analysis of the inertia tensor.
The formulas for common shapes emerge from integrating r²dm over the object's volume. For a solid sphere of radius R and uniform density ρ rotating about a diameter:
Starting with I = ∫r²dm and using spherical coordinates, the calculation yields I = (2/5)MR². The derivation requires careful setup of integration limits and proper accounting for how each mass element contributes based on its perpendicular distance from the axis.
Figure Skating: When skaters pull their arms in during a spin, they reduce their moment of inertia. Conservation of angular momentum requires their rotation rate to increase proportionally, allowing spins exceeding 6 revolutions per second.
Diving: Divers manipulate their moment of inertia throughout a dive. Tucking tightly reduces I and speeds rotation for somersaults; extending straightens the body, increases I, and slows rotation for a controlled entry.
Baseball Bats: The moment of inertia about the handle determines "swing weight." Two bats of equal mass can feel very different depending on how mass distributes along their length. Players often drill holes in bat ends or add weight to handles to adjust this property.
Mass measures the total amount of matter and resistance to linear acceleration. Moment of inertia measures resistance to rotational acceleration and depends on both mass and its distribution relative to the rotation axis. The same mass arranged differently produces different moments of inertia.
Yes, crucially. The same object has different moments of inertia about different axes. A rod rotating about its center has I = (1/12)mL², but rotating about one end gives I = (1/3)mL², four times larger. The parallel axis theorem relates these values.
For the same total mass and outer radius, hollow objects have larger moments of inertia because mass concentrates farther from the axis. A hollow sphere (I = 2/3 mr²) has 67% more moment of inertia than a solid sphere (I = 2/5 mr²) of equal mass and radius.
No. Since I = Σmr² involves only squared terms and positive masses, moment of inertia is always positive. The minimum possible value is zero, achieved only for point masses located exactly on the rotation axis.
In SI units: kg·m² (kilogram-meters squared). In Imperial units: slug·ft² or lb·ft². The conversion is 1 kg·m² ≈ 0.738 slug·ft² ≈ 23.73 lb·ft².
This moment of inertia calculator handles the most common geometric shapes encountered in physics and engineering:
Each calculation displays the formula used and appropriate unit formatting for practical application.
Embed this calculator on your website:
Or share the direct link: